<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Caroline Wizeman - Blogs at Near Infinity</title>


        <link>http://www.nearinfinity.com/blogs/</link>
        <description>Employee Blogs</description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:02:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>Clearance Track feelin&apos; the love in San Antonio</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>I'm writing today from the DSSS (Defense Special Security Systems) Conference in San Antonio. We're here showing Clearance Track, our product for security officers that helps organize and automate the clearance processes associated with getting and keeping your employees' clearances.</p>

<p>I was actually a little bit intimidated when we arrived and started setting up our booth yesterday -- our co-exhibitors rolled into the conference with crates taller than me full of degaussers (I had to google degausser), security doors, liquid scanners, extra large safes, alarm systems, and miscellaneous oversized, super-heavy equipment looking like it was taken from the set of a 1970s spy thriller.  </p>

<p>The truth is, we don't have 2,000 pounds of awesomeness at our booth. Not even if you throw in our pop-up display and our booth babes. Our product is software, so our coolest item is a 30" Apple monitor that we borrowed from our CEO's desk on which we display the software. But we're holding our own. We have a product that people <em>want</em>. One of our first visitors took one look at Clearance Track and said to my co-worker, "you're my new best friend."</p>

<p><img alt="CT-booth-babes.jpg" src="http://www.nearinfinity.com/blogs/CT-booth-babes.jpg" width="360" height="268" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></p>

<p>We thought we would come here and meet lots of security officers from small consulting companies like Near Infinity whose security officers were overwhelmed with processing clearances. But in talking to the attendees, we're finding more government folks charged with managing the clearance data for thousands of military or other government personnel. They use JPAS, but find it insufficient to report on and manage the details of their employees' clearances. They're getting by now with Excel spreadsheets, outdated Access databases, filing cabinets, and whatever info they can remember in their heads.</p>

<p>Clearance Track is a great solution for them. It provides a single, organized place to store all of their clearance data. It makes it easy to report on their secure personnel, easy to find documents related to that person's clearance, easy to pass off responsibilities from one security officer to another, easy to remember to renew a badge, easy to run tedious government reports, easy to auto-generate documents... Who doesn't need easy?</p>

<p>So far, the reaction has been great. Lots of people are raving about how helpful Clearance Track would be in their jobs, how user friendly it is, and how much time it would save them. With a day and a half left to go, we're not missing the heavy equipment too much.</p>

<p>And now, if you'll excuse me, I'd better get back to our booth visitors! </p>

<p><em>Clearance Track is a fast, secure way to manage your clearances. By providing a single place to track your investigations, crossovers, badge renewals, briefings, and certs, Clearance Track significantly streamlines the security officer's job and provides a collaborative environment to organize and store employee data. Use it for 4311s, 4414s, 312s, SF-86s, visit certs, annual security refresher briefings, and key government reports.</em></p>
]]></description>
            <link>http://www.nearinfinity.com/blogs/caroline_wizeman/clearance_track_feelin_the_lov.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.nearinfinity.com/blogs/caroline_wizeman/clearance_track_feelin_the_lov.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Security</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Clearance Track</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:02:33 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Launching Mini Confluence Enterprise Edition at the Atlassian Summit</title>
            <description><![CDATA[We're in San Francisco this week at the Atlassian Summit lunching Mini 
Confluence Enterprise Edition -- a way to access Confluence on your 
iPhone, Blackberry, Palm or Android. <br />
<br />At last year's summit, we released Mini Confluence Personal Edition,
 an iPhone app that individual users can purchase from the app store and
 run based on Confluence's XML-RPC. <br /><br />The new version is a custom 
plugin installed on the server. For people using an iPhone, they still 
download an app from the app store, but with the Enterprise Edition, 
it's free. For people with other mobile devices, they get to Mini 
Confluence through a web client. <br />
<br />This year's version is two times as fast as the original (!), and 
has some cool new features like filtering on the dashboard based on your
 favorites, status updates, landscape mode, and multiple user accounts. 
Find out more about Mini Confluence at <a href="http://www.miniconfluence.com/">www.miniconfluence.com</a>.<br /><u></u>
<br />We've been talking to lots of the conference attendees the past 
couple 
of days. Some of them have already been using the personal edition, and 
have given us feedback on that. Other people have ideas for MCEE, like 
an iPad version, support for Confluence instances protected by VPN, and 
even "make Mini Jira!"<br /><br />I'm surprised by how many people here are 
on Android. It's still mostly 
iPhones, but a lot less Blackberry users than last year. <br />
<br />
A lot 
of people have been signing up for the<a href="http://www.miniconfluence.com/get-it#beta"> beta program </a>-- we're sending out
 copies of the plugin for free to anyone who's interested and letting 
them try it out for three months. I'm anxious to hear the feedback so we
 can improve it before people start paying for it. <br />
<br />If you try it out, let us know what you think!<br /><br />And now... I 
think it's time for some Ghirardelli Chocolate :-) ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.nearinfinity.com/blogs/caroline_wizeman/launching_mini_confluence_ente.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.nearinfinity.com/blogs/caroline_wizeman/launching_mini_confluence_ente.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">iPhone</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Mini Confluence</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:24:31 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>How to switch your Adobe Creative Suite from a PC to a Mac Platform</title>
            <description><![CDATA[I was considering switching from PC to a Mac, but I have Adobe CS4 Design Premium and didn't want to pay the $1,799 to buy it again. It was surprisingly difficult to find any information about whether or not I could do it, and if so how. Some Adobe employees at a trade show even told me that it couldn't be done.<br /><br />It turns out, though, that for $6.25 shipping and handling and the promise that you'll stop using and destroy your older version, they'll let you change. They call it Cross-Platform Swap. Here's how you do it:<br /><br /><ol><li>Go to <a href="http://www.adobe.com/go/supportportal">http://www.adobe.com/go/supportportal</a> If you have an account, log in. If you don't, you'll need to create one.<br /><br /></li><li>Under Get Support, Click on Orders and Returns<br /><br /></li><li>Choose the issue type Return / Exchange / Refund and then click the button that says Proceed to Online Form<br /><br /></li><li>Fill out the form, typing Cross Platform Swap in the subject line. Submit.<br />-- In the notes field, here's what I typed: <i>I am switching to a Mac and would like to do a cross-platform swap. I understand that my existing copy must be destroyed as soon as the new one arrives.</i><br /><br /></li><li>The next day, you'll get an email saying your issue is resolved and providing no useful information. Instructions for what to do next are actually in the ticket itself, which you can get back to on the support portal. Here's what you do:<br />-- Call 1-800-833-6687 and follow the prompts to customer service (#2 then #4)<br />-- Have your case number and credit card ready<br />-- Give them your credit card info and verify all your contact information<br /></li></ol>And that's it. They charge your credit card for $6.25 shipping and handling. Your old serial number gets invalidated, you destroy the old copy, and they send you the new one.<br /><br />As a side note, here's a tip for getting customer service from Adobe: Instead of going to the support portal when you have a question, go to the pages on their website where they have prices and information about purchasing products. Almost immediately, you'll get a helpful person IMing you asking if they can help. These IM helpers are nowhere to be found (ironically) in the support section of their site.<br /><br />Oh, and their customer support phone numbers aren't that easy to find, so here they are:<br /><b>Adobe Customer Support:</b> 1-800-585-0774 option #4<br />or<br /><b>Adobe Customer Support: </b>1-800-833-6687 option #2 then option #4.<br />&nbsp;<br />Good luck platform-swappers!<br /><br />]]></description>
            <link>http://www.nearinfinity.com/blogs/caroline_wizeman/how_to_switch_your_adobe_creat.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.nearinfinity.com/blogs/caroline_wizeman/how_to_switch_your_adobe_creat.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Adobe</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Illustrator</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">InDesign</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Mac</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">PC</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Photoshop</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:33:37 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Inkscape versus Illustrator: The SVG file size throwdown</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>I tried a simple test today. I created identical graphics in
Inkscape and Illustrator. Both had the same canvas size, same colors, shapes
and text. Here's what the simple graphic looked like:</p><img alt="test graphic" src="http://www.nearinfinity.com/blogs/assets/cwizeman/testgraphic.png" width="47" height="47" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /><p>I saved the graphic in both programs as an SVG file.
Inkscape created an SVG file that was 3K; Illustrator's was a ridiculous 473K. I wanted to know what caused the dramatic difference.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">A co-worker suggested I open the SVG files in notepad and
take a look. The Illustrator file contains many lines of garbage code, whereas
the Inkscape file is simple and streamlined. To quantify it, I pasted the full
text file into Word and counted the lines. The Illustrator file totaled 12,512
lines while the Inkscape file was only 89.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">Is this sad showing the best Illustrator can do?<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Fortunately for Adobe, it's not.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">llustrator has hidden a very useful option in its "Save for
Web" feature. In the thousands of times I've used this feature to quickly
create cleanly compacted jpegs, gifs and pngs, I had never noticed that there
was another option there for saving as SVG.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">Select the SVG option in Illustrator's "Save for Web"
screen, and the result is a streamlined SVG file that even beats Inkscape. In my
test, the same graphic was saved as 2.3K and only 58 lines of code.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><b style="">Conclusions:</b> As
long as you use the "Save for Web" option, both Illustrator and Inkscape do an
excellent job of creating lean, developer-friendly SVG files, with a slight
edge going to Illustrator. That being said, if creating SVGs is the main thing
you're looking for in a vector art program, the difference isn't worth
Illustrator's $599 price tag. Save your money and download Inkscape.</p>

<table class="MsoTableGrid" style="border: medium none ; border-collapse: collapse;" border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
 

<tbody>
<tr style="">
  

<td style="border: 1pt solid windowtext; padding: 0in 5.4pt; width: 2.05in;" valign="top" width="197">
  
  </td>
  

<td style="border-style: solid solid solid none; border-color: windowtext windowtext windowtext -moz-use-text-color; border-width: 1pt 1pt 1pt medium; padding: 0in 5.4pt; width: 2.05in;" valign="top" width="197">
  

<p class="MsoNormal"><b style="">File Size</b></p>
  </td>
  

<td style="border-style: solid solid solid none; border-color: windowtext windowtext windowtext -moz-use-text-color; border-width: 1pt 1pt 1pt medium; padding: 0in 5.4pt; width: 2.05in;" valign="top" width="197">
  

<p class="MsoNormal"><b style="">Lines of code</b></p>
  </td>
 </tr>
 

<tr style="">
  

<td style="border-style: none solid solid; border-color: -moz-use-text-color windowtext windowtext; border-width: medium 1pt 1pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt; width: 2.05in;" valign="top" width="197">
  

<p class="MsoNormal">Illustrator SVG </p>
  </td>
  

<td style="border-style: none solid solid none; border-color: -moz-use-text-color windowtext windowtext -moz-use-text-color; border-width: medium 1pt 1pt medium; padding: 0in 5.4pt; width: 2.05in;" valign="top" width="197">
  

<p class="MsoNormal">473K</p>
  </td>
  

<td style="border-style: none solid solid none; border-color: -moz-use-text-color windowtext windowtext -moz-use-text-color; border-width: medium 1pt 1pt medium; padding: 0in 5.4pt; width: 2.05in;" valign="top" width="197">
  

<p class="MsoNormal">12,512</p>
  </td>
 </tr>
 

<tr style="">
  

<td style="border-style: none solid solid; border-color: -moz-use-text-color windowtext windowtext; border-width: medium 1pt 1pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt; width: 2.05in;" valign="top" width="197">
  

<p class="MsoNormal">Inkscape SVG</p>
  </td>
  

<td style="border-style: none solid solid none; border-color: -moz-use-text-color windowtext windowtext -moz-use-text-color; border-width: medium 1pt 1pt medium; padding: 0in 5.4pt; width: 2.05in;" valign="top" width="197">
  

<p class="MsoNormal">3K</p>
  </td>
  

<td style="border-style: none solid solid none; border-color: -moz-use-text-color windowtext windowtext -moz-use-text-color; border-width: medium 1pt 1pt medium; padding: 0in 5.4pt; width: 2.05in;" valign="top" width="197">
  

<p class="MsoNormal">89</p>
  </td>
 </tr>
 

<tr style="">
  

<td style="border-style: none solid solid; border-color: -moz-use-text-color windowtext windowtext; border-width: medium 1pt 1pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt; width: 2.05in;" valign="top" width="197">
  

<p class="MsoNormal">Illustrator "Save for Web" SVG</p>
  </td>
  

<td style="border-style: none solid solid none; border-color: -moz-use-text-color windowtext windowtext -moz-use-text-color; border-width: medium 1pt 1pt medium; padding: 0in 5.4pt; width: 2.05in;" valign="top" width="197">
  

<p class="MsoNormal">2.3K</p>
  </td>
  

<td style="border-style: none solid solid none; border-color: -moz-use-text-color windowtext windowtext -moz-use-text-color; border-width: medium 1pt 1pt medium; padding: 0in 5.4pt; width: 2.05in;" valign="top" width="197">
  

<p class="MsoNormal">58</p>
  </td>
 </tr></tbody></table>

<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.nearinfinity.com/blogs/caroline_wizeman/inkscape_versus_illustrator_the_svg.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.nearinfinity.com/blogs/caroline_wizeman/inkscape_versus_illustrator_the_svg.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:11:42 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Can we all just agree on a definition of Web 2.0?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[
Ask any group of developers, designers, project managers, and executives to articulate what Web 2.0 is, and you're likely to get as many different answers as there are people. Don't count on getting a more consistent definition from the online authorities either.&nbsp; Here are some examples of how different people define it:<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">The surface-skimmers:</span> These non-techies know it when they see it. If the site has rounded corners, windows with gradient backgrounds, a tag cloud, and 3-D "bubbly" icons, it's Web 2.0.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">The Gmail junkies:</span> This group sees Web 2.0 as the ability for web apps to use features traditionally reserved for thick-client applications, like pioneer Gmail. For them, Web 2.0 is all about using Ajax, Ruby and other technologies to offer a better user experience.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">The kitchen sink crowd: </span>For this group, Web 2.0 includes a little bit of everything. One rather authoritative-sounding <a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html?page=1" target="_blank">article from O'Reilly</a> seems to throw in nearly every recent trend they could think of as part of Web 2.0: the Web as a platform, relying on collective intelligence, data-centric applications, continuous improvement of software, trusting users as co-developers, the use of lightweight programming methods, software that works on multiple devices, and rich user experiences. For good measure, they even mention The Long Tail.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Wikipedia:</span> The typically accurate and concise Wikipedia surprised me with what seemed like an off-target definition in their <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0" target="_blank">Web 2.0 entry</a>: <br />
<div style="margin-left: 40px; font-style: italic;">Web 2.0, a phrase coined by O'Reilly Media in 2004, refers to a perceived second-generation of Web-based servicesÃ'such as social networking sites, wikis, communication tools, and folksonomiesÃ'that emphasize online collaboration and sharing among users.<br /></div><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Google:</span> <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;defl=en&amp;q=define:Web+2.0&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=glossary_definition&amp;ct=title" target="_blank">Google Definitions</a> was a little bit clearer: <br />
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Web 2.0 is a term often applied to a perceived ongoing transition of the World Wide Web from a collection of websites to a full-fledged computing platform serving web applications to end users. Ultimately Web 2.0 services are expected to replace desktop computing applications for many purposes.</span><br /></div><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">The term-coiner: </span>I went back to the source, the guy who coined the phrase "Web 2.0," Tim O'Reilly. On his <a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/12/web_20_compact.html" target="_blank">December 2006 blog</a>. Tim refined his definition of Web 2.0: <br />
<div style="margin-left: 40px; font-style: italic;">Web 2.0 is the business revolution in the computer industry caused by the move to the internet as platform, and an attempt to understand the rules for success on that new platform. Chief among those rules is this: Build applications that harness network effects to get better the more people use them. (This is what I've elsewhere called "harnessing collective intelligence.")<br /></div><br />No wonder people like me are scratching our heads when our bosses and clients tell us they want something to be a bit more "Web 2.0-ish." Can we all agree on a definition, or should we just stop using the term before we lose our collectively-intelligent minds?<br /><br />The clarity-loving communicator in me casts this vote. I say we stop using the term Web 2.0 until we can agree on a less ambiguous definition. <br /><br />In the meantime, I have some bubbly icons to create.<br />]]></description>
            <link>http://www.nearinfinity.com/blogs/caroline_wizeman/can_we_all_just_agree.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.nearinfinity.com/blogs/caroline_wizeman/can_we_all_just_agree.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:54:22 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

